You do not need to know how to read PERB decision numbers in order to locate and cite PERB decisions. Information on these agencies can be found on their websites: Glendale, Beverly Hills).īy the time the California state legislature created PERB, both the City and County of Los Angeles had already created agencies for resolving disputes with their employees and the California legislature decided to allow these agencies to continue operating independently. However, PERB does hear disputes involving employees of other cities located within the County of Los Angeles (e.g.
The specific pinpoint page being cited within PERC is page (p.) 330.įor additional details, see the relevant section of the California Style Manual and the box below on Reading PERB Decision Numbers: For example, in the first citation shown here, California State Employees Association (Carrillo) was assigned the decision number 1199-S by PERB and published in volume 21 of PERC beginning at paragraph (¶) number 28099. Most sources of PERB decisions will provide both the decision number assigned by PERB and the location where the decision was published in PERC, both of which should be included in the citation. For example, in the first citation shown here, California State Employees Association is the respondent and Carrillo is the charging party.
Usually, the title consists of the name of respondent (similar to the defendant), sometimes followed in parentheses by the name of the charging party (similar to the plaintiff). Most sources of PERB decisions will provide the title for the decision at the top of the page.
Redwoods Community College District (1996) PERB Dec. Frontman practices before the all California Courts and Central, Eastern and Northern Districts of the United States District Court.According to the California Style Manual, PERB decisions should be cited in the format:Ĭalifornia State Employees Association (Carrillo) (1997) PERB Dec. Frontman received her Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Missouri and earned her Juris Doctor degree from Loyola Law School in 2003. Frontman has litigated writs in Superior Court, and first-chaired and second- chaired Superior Court trials. She has litigated writs in Superior Court, and first and second chaired trials in the in Superior Court.
She has handled a full case load of matters before the Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission and ERCOM arbitrations concerning employee discipline for a wide range of misconduct (including use of force and improper tactics), discrimination, and various alleged MOU violations.
Frontman defends cases of alleged discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, failure to prevent, failure to accommodate, and failure to engage in a good faith interactive process, under the FEHA, and whistleblower actions under Labor Code §1102.5. She also represents clients in administrative hearings and arbitrations. Sally Frontman is a specialist in employment law and public entity defense, in federal and state court.